Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Free Annette Yeomans, Jail Bernie Madoff!

Bernie Madoff isn't in jail but Annette Yeomans is? Yeomans is the bookkeeper who embezzled millions and purchasedcloset over 400 pairs of shoes. If Bernie Madoff's crimes aren't serious enough to warrant tossing him in jail, surely any civilized person with an appetite for shoes could understand Yeomans weakness.

I mean lets be honest, it's not like any of us went to see Sex and the City to witness Carrie Bradshaw and Big's wedding. We went for the clothes, we went for the shoes, we went to see a fictitious and mythical man give a woman a really BIG closet.

When I first heard of Yeomans crime and the 400 pair of shoes my heart skipped a beat just thinking about Shoesa room fill with that many shoes! All the different styles and designers she could slide her feet into, I sighed. There are things that I can live without but there are also things that just shouldn't be missed (wink).

To hell with ballet flats and kitten heels...give me legs that go on forever!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Thursday, February 26, 2009

Yale Finds Link Between Alzheimers's and Mad Cow

A cow [15/365]Image by publicenergy via Flickr

Link found between Alzheimer's, mad cow protein

Thursday, February 26, 2009

(02-25) 19:56 PST -- The latest in a recent flurry of clues on the workings of Alzheimer's disease comes from Yale University researchers who found a link between the disorder and the prion protein, which can cause mad cow disease and other maladies

The Yale team found that the prion protein, whose normal function is to maintain brain health, may contribute to nerve damage if it becomes entangled with a protein fragment that scientists consider a chief suspect as a cause for Alzheimer's disease.

Full Story


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

CNN's HLN: Creating News

The Nadya Suleman Family WebsiteImage by mike912mueller via Flickr

I hate it when I fall asleep with the TV on, I always end up waking up at the crack of dawn to news that irritates me to the point that I can't go back to sleep. Who knows maybe it isn't the news maybe I'm just that crabby at 4 A.M., it is possible. Nonetheless, I fell asleep to Anderson Cooper and woke up to the CNN guy who broadcasts before the CNN girl, Jane whatever-the rest-of -her-name-is.

I don't feel compelled to give either middle of the night CNN anchor a full name because they keep calling Nadya Suleman "Octo-Mom". I'm not condoning Nadya's decision making, defending her competence or that of her doctor but calling her "Octo-Mom" is a deliberately dehumanizing gesture on the part of the media and it only serves to feed into the public hate-frenzy surrounding her as did both programs.

At the crack of dawn Broadcast-Jane's CNN program showed a clip of Nadya Suleman arguing with her mother. The first time the clip was played long enough for viewer to hear Suleman tell her mother that she needed to "let go" as the clip played on Suleman completed her thoughts by connecting that statement to her decision to have all 8 babies. Essentially what Suleman was telling her mother was that the babies are already here and that she can't change what's already happened and Suleman was asking her mother to let go of an issue that could no longer be changed.

Call me crazy but I thought that it was an entirely rational response, Suleman can't go back and make a different decision. Whether her parents or the public agree or disagree the babies are indeed here and continuing to berate her for her decision making won't change history and certainly won't improve anyone's situation.

But what CNN's Broadcast-Jane did after that was to only play the clip long enough to hear Suleman tell her mother that she needed to "let go", without giving the statement any context and making it appear as though Suleman was telling her mother to let go of her grandchildren all together. Naturally Broadcast-Jane's professional guest panel ripped the statement apart having taken her statement completely out of context.

Later Broadcast-Jane's program showed a clip of Suleman kissing the cheeks of one the older twins while she held him drinking his bottle. One of members of Broadcast-Jane's expert panel called the Suleman cheek kissing "inappropriate." Seriously? I witness what I would deem inappropriate every time I go shopping, an overdose of chubby cheek kissing and raspberry belly-blows would be a very welcomed change!

My question is this, how would the media have depicted her if she would have just sat there? Disconnected, unresponsive...I think we all know that no matter how Suleman responded no one was going to depict her in a fair light, let alone a favorable light. None of the experts seemed to note the body language of the baby she was holding. It certainly wasn't the first time that child had been held and rocked while he drank his bottle. He relaxed into her like the position was familiar, he made eye contact with her and he looked healthy, well, relaxed and happy, all of her kids did.

If Sulemon belongs under a microscope then so does every low income or slightly dysfunctional person in the country. We condone the Duggers issuing a new baby every year and their up to baby 18, seriously how much does Mr. Dugger earn without television and advertising? How much of their family's help with younger children comes from older sibling? What about the John Gosselin from John and Kate Plus Eight...when they decided to give birth to all 6 babies did they know how they were going to afford to care for all of them? Didn't they take incredible risks to the childrens health by not reducing the number? When their babies were born did they have a big enough house for 6 cribs? How many embryos were implanted in Kate to make 6 babies and who paid for her postpartum plastic surgery?

I'm sorry Broadcast-Jane but if kissing the chubby cheeks of babies is "inappropriate" then I'm perpetually out of line and my friend Mary Strohmayer. who is a mother of 5, is a criminal! She comes from a family of 5 rambunctious brothers, has 5 children of her own, is dying to be a grandmother and has nieces and nephews stacked to the ceiling, I know for a fact that she also shamelessly kisses chubby cheeks because I've witnessed it more at her house than in any other home I've ever been in.

The bottom line is, whether we agree or disagree the babies are here and we all need to let go and move on. If you object to what happened write to your Congressman and have a bill drafted that establishes stricter guidelines for fertility clinics. But to call Suleman's baby kissing inappropriate and in the same breath ignore the conduct of the scores of people camped out and following Suleman to shouting obscenities and scream about tax payer dollars. What kind of experts are these to object to cheek kissing and over look cruel malicious behavior? What kind of a a hate filled society do we live in and why are we so willing to rip the weak to shreds.

What makes it all even more perplexing is the fact that a massive group of completely rational, financially secure Wall Street bankers just ripped American tax payers off for billions. I don't understand why tax concerned hate-mongers aren't shouting at them from Wall Street, screaming for the return of unearned bonus money and their resignations! Frankly I think they are by far more deserving of our public outrage. Watching Bernie Madoff smirking at the media as he makes his way to his penthouse lights my fuse in a way that Suleman's food stamp mony never will. Isn't the money going straight back intot he economy because its ALL getting spent on food at her neighborhood grocery store? And the billions given to banks...well part of our economic issue stems from the fact that they're not loaning out the money so it isn't helping the economy.

Again, I'm not saying I agree or condone but I think all perspective has been seriously lost, and I think in a number of ways Sulemoan is being demonized by the media as seen on Jane Velez Mitchell's program. Suleman may be dysfunctional and misguided but you'll find that among any group of parents, she isn't hurtful, she isn't malicious and her children are at ease and well.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Saturday, February 14, 2009

American Banking Oligarchs: Bill Moyers Journal

PBS Transcript:
February 13, 2009

BILL MOYERS: Welcome to the Journal.

The battle is joined as they say — and here's the headline that framed it: "High Noon: Geithner v. The American Oligarchs." The headline is in one of the most informative new sites in the blogosphere called: baselinescenario.com. Here's the quote that grabbed me:

"There comes a time in every economic crisis, or more specifically, in every struggle to recover from a crisis, when someone steps up to the podium to promise the policies that — they say — will deliver you back to growth. The person has political support, a strong track record, and every incentive to enter the history books. But one nagging question remains. Can this person, your new economic strategist, really break with the vested elites that got you into this much trouble?"

Full story and podcast

Related Media from PBS website:

James Galbraith
Bill Moyers sits down to talk about the economic future with James K. Galbraith, Lloyd M. Bentsen, Jr. Chair in Government/Business Relations at the LBJ School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas at Austin. Galbraith is the author of six books, the most recent, THE PREDATOR STATE: HOW CONSERVATIVES ABANDONED THE FREE MARKET AND WHY LIBERALS SHOULD TOO. (October 24, 2008)

George Soros, photo by Robin HollandGeorge Soros
Bill Moyers talks with one of the world's most successful investors George Soros about the global capital meltdown, how he saw it coming, and what can be done now. (October 10, 2008)

Kevin PhillipsKevin Phillips on BAD MONEY
Bill Moyers sits down with former Nixon White House strategist and political and economic critic Kevin Phillips, whose latest book BAD MONEY: RECKLESS FINANCE, FAILED POLITICS, AND THE GLOBAL CRISIS OF AMERICAN CAPITALISM explores the role that the crumbling financial sector played in the now-fragile American economy. (September 19, 2008)

Joe Nocera, photo by Robin HollandJoe Nocera
JOURNAL guest-host Deborah Amos speaks with NEW YORK TIMES business columnist Joe Nocera about the bailout mania in Washington and who's next in line to get federal assistance. (November 21, 2008)

HeadlinesWinners and Losers
NEW YORK TIMES business and financial columnists Gretchen Morgenson and Floyd Norris discuss who wins and who loses in the financial turmoil. (September 19, 2008)

FBI Domestic Spy PosterFacing up to the Economy
Bill Moyers talks with economist Dean Baker and journalist Bob Herbert about the economic challenges facing the government and the populace. (August 8, 2008)

FBI Domestic Spy PosterMortgage Mess
THE JOURNAL travels to ground zero of the mortgage meltdown — Cleveland, Ohio. Correspondent Rick Karr takes viewers to Slavic Village, one of the hardest hit neighborhoods in the nation when it comes to the spate of foreclosures caused by the subprime mortgage crisis. (July 18, 2008)

References and Reading from PBS website:

"Geithner Said to Have Prevailed on the Bailout"
By Stephen Labaton and Edmund L. Andrews, NEW YORK TIMES, February 9, 2009.

"Bank Test May Expand U.S. Regulators' Role "
By Eric Dash, NEW YORK TIMES, February 11, 2009

"Bailout Plan: $2.5 Trillion and a Strong U.S. Hand"
By Edmund L. Andrews and Stephen Labaton, NEW YORK TIMES, February 10, 2009.

"Congressmen Hear from TARP Recipients Who Funded Their Campaigns"
by Lindsay Renick Mayer, CAPITAL EYE, February 10, 2009.

"So what is the plan?"
By Mark Thoma, THE ECONOMISTS VIEW, February 10, 2009.

"Special Report: A World of Trouble"
Get up-to-date international news and perspective from GlobalPost.

Simon Johnson

"Axelrod And Emanuel Were Right (On The American Bank Oligarchs)"
By Simon Johnson, THE BASELINE SCENARIO, February 10, 2009.

"High Noon: Geithner versus the American Oligarchs"
By Simon Johnson, THE BASELINE SCENARIO, February 8, 2009.

"Baseline Scenario for 2/9/2009 (11pm edition, February 8)"
By Peter Boone, Simon Johnson, and James Kwak, THE BASELINE SCENARIO, February 9, 2009.

"Global Economic Outlook (Senate Testimony)"
By Simon Johnson, THE BASELINE SCENARIO, January 29, 2009.

Published February 6, 2009.

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Merrill Lynch Make 696 Millionaires Before Bailout and Merger

Watchdog blasts Merrill bonuses

Merrill doled out 'gigantic' bonuses despite heavy losses, says Cuomo

By Aaron Smith, CNNMoney.com staff writer


Single-Payer Bill Introduced in the House -H.R. 676

Take Action:
Tell your representatives to support single-payer health care!

Rep. John Conyers has reintroduced HR 676, The United States National Health Care Act, which would eliminate private insurance companies and create a national health care system that would guarantee that all Americans have access to high-quality health care.

A single-payer system would be financed by taxpayers and would remove financial barrierse, such as unaffordable co-payments and premiums, that prevent people from seeking needed care.

Please, call your representative today regarding this crucial issue! Our goal is to flood congressional offices with calls so lawmakers understand how crucial it is to fix the health care crisis.

If he or she is currently a co-sponsor or co-sponsored HR 676 in the past, ask him or her to stand firm for the bill and actively seek additional co-sponsors. If he or she has yet to co-sponsor HR 676, ask him or her to please become a co-sponsor immediately!

You can find your member of the House here, or simply call the Capitol switchboard at (202) 224-3121 and ask for your representative. Don't know if your representative is a co-sponsor of HR 676? Find out here.

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

Obama: Executives Rewarded for Failure


Saturday, January 10, 2009

Mooning Over the Moon: Biggest Full Moon of 2009!

By Robert Roy Britt
updated 1:36 p.m. CT, Fri., Jan. 9, 2009

If skies are clear Saturday, go out at sunset and look for the giant moon rising in the east. It will be the biggest and brightest one of 2009, sure to wow even seasoned observers.


Earth, the moon and the sun are all bound together by gravity, which keeps us going around the sun and keeps the moon going around us as it goes through phases. The moon makes a trip around Earth every 29.5 days

Sunday, January 4, 2009

Leave it to Blagojevich


Bush Sr.: "Just Google all of my son's failures..." Reporters Discover Too Many Search Results


Fox News

Bush Sr.: Just Google all of my son's failures

Bush Sr.: Just Google all of my son's failures
icon Download | Play icon Download | Play

In a somewhat understandably soft ball interview with Chris Wallace, former President George H.W. Bush defends what is by most accounts his son's epic failure of a presidency and defers to "the Google" when asked about which things W could be "fairly criticized for."

Bush: He's gonna come home with his head high, knowing he ran a clean operation and he kept this country strong and free after an unprecedented history attack of 9/11. He'll have a lot too be proud of and he can start by his mother and father being very proud of him...and we always will be.

Wallace: You said there earlier there are some things he could fairly be criticized for. Would you like to tell me any of those?

Bush: "No. You can go back to your, what do you call it.... Your Google, and you figure all that out."

On some level you gotta feel sorry for Papa Bush. It's pretty clear that he always wanted his other son, Jeb, to be the second Bush President.

Saturday, January 3, 2009

Gladwell and the Influence of Personal Passion


In his book Outliers Malcolm Gladwell discusses the significance of the 10k Hour Rule which introduced the notion that among the keys to becoming extraordinarily successful in a field is the requirement of approximately 10k hours of practice. Gladwell's theory is based in part on research by Anders Ericsson who in the early 1990s studied violinists at the Berlin Academy of Music. In his book Gladwell asserts the following:

“The curious thing about Ericsson’s study is that he and his colleagues couldn’t find any “naturals” - musicians who could float effortlessly to the top while practicing a fraction of the time that their peers did. Nor could they find “grinds”, people who worked harder than everyone else and yet just didn’t have what it takes to break into the top ranks. Their research suggested that once you have enough ability to get into a top music school, the thing that distinguishes one performer from another is how hard he or she works. That’s it. What’s more, the people at the very top don’t just work much harder than everyone else. They work much, much harder.”

In his book Gladwell reviews a select number of individual who achieved extraordinary success by putting in their 10k hours. But there is another commonality that emerges among his examples...they are all personally driven to put in their 10k hours. The Beatles Steve Jobs, Bill Gates and Bill Joy were all to varying degrees obsessed as though they had an internal need. My question is, would success have come to Bill Joy if he lacked the personal drive yet put in his 10k hours because his father insisted he learn and master computer programming? While 10k hours may be the magic number, is personal drive and passion also a necessary part of the Outliers formula?

As a young mother my 4 year old son insisted that he could be an actor so when an open audition came up in Minneapolis with a well known agency I took him believing that it would be a good learning experience...success doesn't come overnight and acting takes hard work.

Parents weren't allowed to watch the auditions, my son was lead into a room where he met agents and was rated on a scale for one to ten. The agency called later to say that Nick scored a perfect 10, that they not only wanted to sign him but that they also wanted to send him on an audition for Target the following day. I naturally verified that they didn't have my son confused with someone else because he wasn't notorious for being cooperative in preschool.

Nick and I went to the audition and I received a call that evening, Target wanted to sign Nick for their Christmas advertisement. Since they used the word advertisement I assumed he was doing print work, when I discussed signing Target contracts I discovered that Target had hired him for a television commercial. To recap, within 2 weeks of Nick's audition he was on a set filming his first television commercial, by 5 he was a member of AFTRA and had his own medical and dental policy through the actors union. Nicholas went on to do oodles of print work, and a long list of television commercials including a McDonald's Christmas commercial which aired for several years world wide and an ABC mini series. I eventually withdrew the boys from acting because of health complications.

The point of my story is that The Beatles, Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Bill Joy and even my 4 year old son all shared a passion, a drive...and what appears to me to be an inner knowing of where in the universe they naturally fit best.

While Gladwell discusses the Matthew effect in Outliers, I'd like to introduces my own biblically inspired theory which I will call: many are called but few are chosen. Maybe Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, and Bill Joy were obsessed because their obsession was exactly where they belonged and they had an innate understanding of that fact just like my son did...maybe passion and obsession are intertwined with the personal destiny of certain individuals. Maybe Gates, Jobs, and Joy were the "chosen" referred to in the biblical text and maybe still others are merely "called," meaning they lack a specific passion or drive and therefore are not destine to achieve an Outliers spectacular level of success.

While I have no disagreement with the 10k Hour Rule I do wonder if personal drive isn't a necessary part of the equation. Are we assuming that an uninterested violinist may achieve an Outliers success with the right factors by merely completing of their 10k hours? Or do uninterested violinists quit playing because the volume of time needed is drudgery when you lack the drive, love and passion for the pursuit ...THEREFORE those individuals did not end up represented in Anders Ericsson's research because they stopped playing.

Gladwell again raises fascinating questions regarding our assumptions about the road to success. He suggests that a part of the formula may very well be a quantifiable amount of practice. I would seriously caution parents against making a child practice more rigorously in hopes of inducing an Outlier but I would encourage parents to pay careful attention to those things their children are passionately interested in and remember the 10k Hour Rule when worrying whether or not Johnny is spending too much time doing...X. In the cases of Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, The Beatles and Bill Joy that obsessive dedication factored into their ultimate success.

* On a side note, I think many people have passion and drive but we're often taught that this factor is unimportant. We see growing up and maturing as putting away childish dreams and notions...like being a television actor. Had I not taken Nick on that audition, he may have never had the opportunity to prove me wrong. My motive was to help him gain insight into the world, that could have been a spirit squelching dose realism. Nick taught me to believe in the wisdom of the spirit. Author Paulo Coelho once wrote "When you really want something to happen, the whole universe conspires so that your wish comes true." Sometimes it does.

***On a quirky side note, I looked up Malcolm Gladwell's biography and discover that he and I share the same birthday also, when I selected a fictional town name for a novel I'm working on I picked Elmira, thinking that I sort of made it up. Elmira is where Malcolm Gladwell grew up, just thought it was an interesting coincidence.

Thursday, January 1, 2009

New Years Eve: Kathy Griffin's Finest Moment

Nothing that happened New Years Eve supassed the uproar of laughter caused by Kathy Griffin.